Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Journal articles

Reviewing the scope and thematic focus of 100,000 publications on energy consumption, services and social aspects of climate change: A big data approach to demand-side mitigation

Felix Creutzig 1, 2 Max Callaghan 1, 3 Anjali Ramakrishnan 1, 2 Aneeque Javaid 1 Leila Niamir 1 Jan Minx 1, 3 Finn Müller-Hansen 1 Benjamin Sovacool 4 Zakia Afroz 5, 6 Mark Andor 7 Miklós Antal 8, 9 Victor Court 10 Nandini Das 11 Julio Díaz-José 12 Friederike Doebbe 13 Maria Figueroa 14 Andrew Gouldson 3 Helmut Haberl 9 Andrew Hook 4 Diana Ivanova 3 William Lamb 1, 3 Nadia Maïzi 15 Érika Mata 16 Kristian Steensen Nielsen 14 Chioma Daisy Onyige 17 Lucia Reisch 14 Joyashree Roy 11, 18 Pauline Scheelbeek 19 Mahendra Sethi 1, 2 Shreya Some 11, 20 Steven Sorrell 4 Mathilde Tessier 21, 15 Tania Parveen Urmee 6 Doris Virág 9 Can Wang 22 Dominik Wiedenhofer 9 Charlie Wilson 23, 24
Abstract : As current action remains insufficient to meet the goals of the Paris agreement let alone to stabilize the climate, there is increasing hope that solutions related to demand, services and social aspects of climate change mitigation can close the gap. However, given these topics are not investigated by a single epistemic community, the literature base underpinning the associated research continues to be undefined. Here, we aim to delineate a plausible body of literature capturing a comprehensive spectrum of demand, services and social aspects of climate change mitigation. As method we use a novel double-stacked expert—machine learning research architecture and expert evaluation to develop a typology and map key messages relevant for climate change mitigation within this body of literature. First, relying on the official key words provided to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change by governments (across 17 queries), and on specific investigations of domain experts (27 queries), we identify 121 165 non-unique and 99 065 unique academic publications covering issues relevant for demand-side mitigation. Second, we identify a literature typology with four key clusters: policy, housing, mobility, and food/consumption. Third, we systematically extract key content-based insights finding that the housing literature emphasizes social and collective action, whereas the food/consumption literatures highlight behavioral change, but insights also demonstrate the dynamic relationship between behavioral change and social norms. All clusters point to the possibility of improved public health as a result of demand-side solutions. The centrality of the policy cluster suggests that political actions are what bring the different specific approaches together. Fourth, by mapping the underlying epistemic communities we find that researchers are already highly interconnected, glued together by common interests in sustainability and energy demand. We conclude by outlining avenues for interdisciplinary collaboration, synthetic analysis, community building, and by suggesting next steps for evaluating this body of literature.
Complete list of metadata

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03097209
Contributor : Mathilde Tessier <>
Submitted on : Tuesday, July 13, 2021 - 8:29:45 AM
Last modification on : Tuesday, July 20, 2021 - 10:47:25 AM

File

Creutzig_2021_Environ._Res._Le...
Publication funded by an institution

Licence


Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Identifiers

Citation

Felix Creutzig, Max Callaghan, Anjali Ramakrishnan, Aneeque Javaid, Leila Niamir, et al.. Reviewing the scope and thematic focus of 100,000 publications on energy consumption, services and social aspects of climate change: A big data approach to demand-side mitigation. Environmental Research Letters, IOP Publishing, 2021, 16 (3), pp.033001. ⟨10.1088/1748-9326/abd78b⟩. ⟨hal-03097209⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

132

Files downloads

12