Four MPC implementations compared on the Quadruple Tank Process Benchmark: pros and cons of neural MPC - IMT - Institut Mines-Télécom Accéder directement au contenu
Article Dans Une Revue IFAC-PapersOnLine Année : 2022

Four MPC implementations compared on the Quadruple Tank Process Benchmark: pros and cons of neural MPC

Résumé

This study aims to aid understanding of Model Predictive Control (MPC) alternatives through comparing most interesting MPC implementations. This comparison will be performed intrinsically and illustrated using the four-tank benchmark, widely studied by academics taking care of industrial perspectives. Although MPC provides advanced control solutions for a wide class of dynamical systems, challenges arise in managing the compromise between accuracy, computational cost and resilience, depending on the type of model used. In this study, linear, linear time-varying and non-linear MPCs are compared to MPC that uses a neural network based predictive model identified from data. The tuning and implementation methods considered are discussed, and accurate simulation results provided and analyzed. Precisely, the performance of each method (linear, linear time-varying, non-linear MPC) are compared to the neural MPC. Pros and cons of neural MPC are highlighted.

Domaines

Automatique
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
1-s2.0-S2405896322012241-main.pdf (875.23 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origine : Fichiers éditeurs autorisés sur une archive ouverte

Dates et versions

hal-03631171 , version 1 (28-09-2022)

Licence

Paternité - Pas d'utilisation commerciale - Pas de modification

Identifiants

Citer

Pierre Clément Blaud, Philippe Chevrel, Fabien Claveau, Pierrick Haurant, Anthony Mouraud. Four MPC implementations compared on the Quadruple Tank Process Benchmark: pros and cons of neural MPC. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 2022, IFAC-PapersOnLine, 55 (16), pp.344-349. ⟨10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.09.048⟩. ⟨hal-03631171⟩
130 Consultations
83 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More